Advertisement

Astrologers’ perceptions are based more on hearsay and conjecture than what they learn from the study of the stars. Comment with reference to the story.


People suffer from many superstitions. One of the popular superstitions is the perception of arstrologers towards astrology. Whether astrology is science or not may be a debatable issue. It is true that astrologers don’t base their perceptions on the study of stars. Nor do they care much for the movement of the planets and their effect on man’s life. They are like Shastri of the story. All their predictions are based on hearsay and conjecture. They are not based on any scientific or rational study of stars.

The attitude of Shastri in the story is self-explanatory. He is merely a parrot. He utters what the narrator asks him to say. Shastri replies that ‘a girl’ is the cause of Ranga’s unhappiness. The narrator asks Shastri if there is any chance of their negotiations for Ratna bearing fruit. The astrologer replies “definitely”.

Sometimes astrologers are tutored by their clients. They move their lips and count on their fingers just to impress unsuspecting persons. Shastri exactly does so to impress Ranga. The poor fellow doesn’t know that Shastri has repeated what he has been tutored. He only knows that whatever the astrologer says is “absolutely true”.

1016 Views

Advertisement

Indian society has moved a long way from the way the marriage is arranged in the story. Discuss.


Comment on the influence of English—the language and the way of life—on Indian life as reflected in the story. What is the narrator’s attitude to English?


What kind of a person do you think the narrator is?


Advertisement