Advertisement

There is a view that absolute economic equality is neither possible nor desirable. It is argued that the most a society can do is to try and reduce the gaps between the richest and the poorest members of the society. Do you agree?


Economic inequalities is the indicator of opposite situations of economic equality.

(i)In other way, we could say that economic inequality prevails in a society if there are vital differences in wealth, property or income between individuals of different classes, prevailing in the society (Highest, lower–highest, upper–middle, lower middle, upper lower and the lowest or the people living below the poverty line).

(ii)According to economists one of the measuring the degree of economic inequality in a society would be to measure the relative difference between the richest and poorest groups. Another method or way could to estimate the member of people who live below the poverty live.

(iii)With equal opportunities inequalities may continue to exist between individuals but there is the opportunities inequalities may continue to exist between individuals but there is the possibility of improving one’s position in the society with sufficient effort.

(iv)Most democracies today make efforts to provide equal opportunities to their people in the belief that this would at least give those who have talent and determination the chance to improve their conditions.

(v)Every progressive and justice loving society desire economic equality in its zone because inequalities, which remain relatively untouched over generations are more dangerous for a society. If in a society certain classes of people have enjoyed considerable wealths, and the power which goes with it, over generations, the society would become divided between those classes and others who have remained poor over generations.

(vi)As more and more time passes economic disparities or inequalities can give rise to powerful resentment and violence at a very large scale. Because of the power the wealthy classes it might prove difficult to reform such a society to make it more open and egalitarian.

181 Views

Advertisement

A government report on farmers’ problems says that small and marginal farmers cannot get good prices from the market. It recommends that the government should intervene to ensure a better price but only for small and marginal farmers. Is this recommendation consistent with the principle of equality?


Match the following concepts with appropriate instances:

(a). Affirmative action

(b). Equality of opportunity

(c). Equal Rights

(i) Every adult citizen has a right to vote.

(ii) Banks offer higher rate of interest to senior citizens.

(iii) Every child should get free education.


Which of the following violate the principles of equality? And why?

(a) Every child in class will read the text of the play by turn.

(b) The government of Canada encouraged white Europeans to migrate to Canada from the end of the Second world War till 1960.

(c) There is a separate railway reservation counter for the senior citizens.

(d) Access to some forest areas is reserved for certain tribal communities.

Some people argue that inequality is natural while others maintain that it is equality which is natural and the inequalities which we notice around us are created by society. Which view do you support? Give reasons.


First 1 Last
Advertisement