(i) The forest department refused permission to the villagers to fell ash trees for agricultural tools.
(ii) The villagers protested against the practice of commercial logging that the government had permitted. The government had allotted the same patch of land to a sports manufacturer for commercial use.
(iii) There were larger issues of ecological and economic exploitation of the region. The villagers demanded that no forest-exploiting contracts should be given to outsiders and local communities should have effective control over natural resources like land, water and forests.
(iv) People demanded that the government should provide low cost materials to small industries and ensure development of the region without disturbing the ecological balance.
(v) There was issue of landless forest workers. The movement demanded guarantees of minimum wage.
(vi) The forest contractors doubled up as supplier of alcohol to men. Women were against this habit of alcoholism and held sustained agitations against it. They joined the movement and broadened the agenda of the movement to cover other social issues.
Impact of the movement : (i) The government issued a ban on felling of trees in the Himalayan regions for fifteen years, until the green cover was fully restored.
(ii) The Chipko Movement became a symbol of many such movements which emerged in different parts of the country during the 1970s and later.
(a) Social movements are hampering the functioning of India’s democracy.
(b) The main strength of social movements lies in their mass base across social sections.
(c) Social movements in India emerged because there were many issues that political parties did not address.