Advertisement

The Wealthy Shudra

This story, based on a Buddhist text in Pali known as the Majjhima Nikaya, is part of a dialogue between a king named Avantiputta and a disciple of the Buddha named Kachchana. While it may not be literally true, it reveals Buddhist attitudes towards varna.

Avantiputta asked Kachchana what he thought about Brahmanas who held that they were the best caste and that all other castes were low; that Brahmanas were a fair caste while all other castes were dark; that only Brahmanas were pure, not non-Brahmanas; that Brahmanas were sons of Brahma, born of his mouth, born of Brahma, formed by Brahma, heirs to Brahma.

Kachchana replied: “What if a Shudra were wealthy..... would another Shudra ... or a Kshatriya or a Brahmana or a Vaishya ... speak politely to him?”

Avantiputta replied that if a Shudra had wealth or corn or gold or silver, he could have as his obedient servant another Shudra to get up earlier than he, to go to rest later, to carry out his orders, to speak politely; or he could even have a Kshatriya or a Brahmana or a Vaishya as his obedient servant.

Kachchana asked: “This being so, are not these four varnas exactly the same ?”

Avantiputta conceded that there was no difference amongst the varnas on this count.
A. What did Avantiputta want to know from Kachchana about Brahmanas?
B. What was Kachchana’s reply? Explain.
C. If a Shudra had wealth, would Brahmanas and others speak to him politely? Give reasons.


A. Avantiputta wanted to know from Kachchana about Brahmanas , what he thought about Brahmanas who held that they were the best caste and that all other castes were low. The claim of Brahmanas, they were fair caste while the people of all other castes were dark. The claims of Brahmanas were pure and non-Brahmanas are not pure. They claimed that they were sons of Brahma and were born of his mouth.

B. Kachchana replied what if a Shudra is wealthy would another Shudra or a Kshatriya or a Brahmana or a Vaishya politely to him. He further replied that wealth used to change the status of the people therefore, the status fixed by Varnas exactly is not always the same.

C. If a Shudra had wealth, Brahmanas and others would speak him to politely because wealth changes the socio-economic status of a person. If a Shudra is wealthy definetely other Shudras or a Kshatriya or Brahmana or Vaishya will change attitudes towards him.

Avantiputta replied that if a Shudra had wealth or corn or gold or silver, he could have as his obedient servant another Shudra to get up earlier than he, to go to rest later, to carry out his orders, to speak politely; or he could even have a Kshatriya or a Brahmana or a Vaishya as his obedient servant.
215 Views

Advertisement

A mother’s advice:

The Mahabharata describes how, when war between the Kauravas and the Pandavas became almost inevitable, Gandhari made one last appeal to her eldest son Duryodhana:

By making peace you honour your father and me, as well as your well-wishers ... it is the wise man in control of his senses who guards his kingdom. Greed and anger drag a man away from his profits; by defeating these two enemies a king conquers the earth ... You will happily enjoy the earth, my son, along with the wise and heroic Pandavas ... There is no good in a war, no law (dharma) and profit (artha), let alone happiness: nor is there (necessarily) victory in the end - don't set your mind on war ...

Duryodhana did not listen to this advice and fought and lost the war.
A. Explain briefly Gandhari’s appeal to Duryodhana.
B. Do you agree with Gandhari’s advice to Duryodhana? Give two arguments in support of your answer.
C. Why did Duryodhana not listen to his mother’s advice? Give two possible reasons.

A. Gandhari appealed to Duryodhana that he should make peace with the Pandavas. By doing so he would honour his father and mother. As well as, his all well-wishers. According to Gandhari every wiseman always tries to control his senses, specially the ruler or the person who acts as guards of their kingdoms. She further appealed her son to give up greed and anger because these two evils drag a man away from his profits. Gandhari further appealed that if a king defeat greed and anger he can became the great conqueror of the whole earth.

B. I agree with Gandhari’s advice to Duryodhana. I can give the following arguments in support of my answer:

(a) Greed is a curse. It is an evil. Duryodhana prefers war because he was a stubborn. He did not knew exactly the power and popularity of the Pandavas.

(b) Anger is the root cause of conflicts, battles and wars. War is the second name of destruction. As far as possible war should be avoided.

C. (a) Duryodhana did not listen to his mother's advice because he was very ambitious. He used to consider the Pandavas his political rivals and enemies.

(b) Duryodhana was very proud angry man. He was not a wise man. He could not control his evil senses.
1321 Views

Advertisement